There has never been a time in human history when sex was talked about so openly. It is on television, on smartphones, in music videos, in movies, on social media, and in advertisements. Pornography is now only a click away. Influencers discuss bedroom matters without embarrassment. Entire industries thrive on selling sex, sex appeal, and sexual fantasies.
Yet, beneath all the noise lies a startling paradox: people are having less sex.
The contradiction is almost comical. We live in an age where everyone seems to be talking about sex, watching sex, acting sex, selling sex, or consuming sexual content. Yet legitimate sexual intimacy, especially within committed relationships and marriages, is becoming less frequent.
Pastors today find themselves in an unusual position. They spend considerable time begging unmarried people to abstain from sex while simultaneously encouraging married couples to have more of it. It sounds ironic, but it reflects a troubling reality. Many married couples are struggling with sexless or near-sexless relationships.
Research from different parts of the world points in the same direction. A major study published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior found that American adults in the early 2010s were having sex about nine fewer times per year than adults in the late 1990s. More surprisingly, the decline was not limited to singles. Sexual frequency also declined among married and cohabiting couples.
Data from Britain’s National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles reached a similar conclusion. Researchers found that sexual activity had declined significantly, with the sharpest reductions occurring among married or cohabiting couples and adults aged 25 and above. Even more revealing was that many respondents reported wishing they had sex more often than they currently did.
Recent data from the National Survey of Family Growth in the United States found rising levels of sexlessness among young adults. Between 2013-2015 and 2022-2023, the proportion of young men who had not had sex in the previous year rose dramatically, while similar increases were recorded among women. Researchers noted that much of the decline involved monogamous relationships rather than casual encounters.
You may also like;
- Inside Mentor To Marry: Pastor Kingsley Okonkwo’s ₦700k Christian Matchmaking Platform
- Breasts Are Not Chests: Why Berlin’s Topless Swimming Rule Is a Step Too Far
- Why Nigerians Naturally Turn to Prayer During Crisis and Why Action Still Matters
- More Pastors, Better Society? The Moral Burden Of Church’s Mass Ordination
The findings challenge one of the greatest assumptions of modern society, which greater sexual freedom automatically translates into more sexual activity. Apparently, it does not.
The question is why.
One explanation is the digital revolution. Today, couples may sleep in the same bed but live in different worlds. One partner scrolls endlessly through TikTok videos. Another is binge-watching a television series. Someone else is responding to emails long after midnight. Smartphones have become third parties in many marriages.
Researchers have increasingly linked excessive screen use to reduced intimacy. Studies suggest that when couples spend less quality time together and more time with digital devices, sexual frequency tends to decline.
Another factor is stress. Without mincing words, modern life is exhausting. Inflation is rising. Jobs are demanding. Commuting is draining. Parents are raising children under economic pressures that previous generations could scarcely imagine. By the time many couples get into bed, they are physically present but emotionally depleted.
There is also the pornography factor. Interestingly, some studies suggest that pornography alone cannot explain declining sexual activity. However, it would be naive to dismiss its impact entirely. Pornography creates unrealistic expectations, promotes fantasy over reality, and often conditions individuals to seek stimulation that real-life partners may never be able to match. It trains the mind to consume sexuality rather than participate in intimacy.
That distinction is important. Sex and intimacy are not identical. Pornography offers stimulation without commitment. Marriage requires commitment before stimulation. Pornography demands nothing. Marriage demands communication, sacrifice, patience, forgiveness, and emotional vulnerability. One is consumption, the other is connection. Perhaps the greatest tragedy of our age is that many people have mastered sexual imagery while forgetting emotional intimacy. For married couples, the implications are profound.
A sexless marriage does not automatically mean a failed marriage. There are seasons when illness, childbirth, grief, aging, or other legitimate circumstances may reduce sexual activity. Marriage is built on far more than physical intimacy.
However, when sexual withdrawal becomes chronic and unresolved, it often signals deeper problems. Sex is one of the primary ways spouses express affection, acceptance, and emotional closeness. It reassures partners that they are desired and valued. When that connection disappears for prolonged periods, feelings of rejection can emerge.
Resentment begins quietly. Communication becomes strained. Affection reduces. Partners become roommates. Eventually, emotional distance grows. Many marriages do not collapse because of a single dramatic event. They die slowly through neglect.
The absence of sexual intimacy can also increase vulnerability to infidelity. This is not to justify cheating. Adultery remains a choice for which individuals bear responsibility. Nevertheless, emotional and physical deprivation can create conditions that make temptation more potent.
Human beings naturally seek connection. When that need is persistently unmet at home, some begin looking elsewhere. Others retreat into pornography. Some bury themselves in work. Others become emotionally attached to someone outside the marriage. In each case, the marriage suffers.
There are broader societal implications as well.
Declining intimacy contributes to declining marriage rates and declining fertility rates. Many countries are already experiencing population crises because fewer people are marrying and fewer children are being born. Researchers have repeatedly linked falling sexual activity to delayed marriage and weakening relationship formation.
A society may celebrate sexual liberation while simultaneously facing loneliness, declining family formation, and shrinking populations. That is the paradox of our era.
We have more sexual content than any generation before us. Yet many people feel less connected. We have more opportunities for virtual intimacy. Yet many struggle with real intimacy. We can discuss sex publicly with strangers online. Yet some couples cannot discuss it honestly with their spouses.
Perhaps the problem is that modern society has confused visibility with intimacy. Sex has become public entertainment rather than private connection. It has become a product to consume rather than a relationship to nurture. The result is a world saturated with sexual imagery but increasingly starved of genuine intimacy.
The lesson is simple. A healthy marriage cannot survive indefinitely on shared bills, shared children, and shared accommodation alone. Emotional and physical intimacy remain essential components of marital health. Couples must deliberately create time for one another in a world designed to steal attention. They must learn to put down their phones, turn off the screens, have difficult conversations, and rediscover each other.
The greatest threat to marriage today may not be sexual temptation. It may be sexual indifference. And that is a far more silent danger. In an age where sex is everywhere, genuine intimacy is becoming one of the rarest commodities on earth.
